The coarse-grained final clastics were
previously interpreted as a basal transgressive series (Schlagintweit, Gawlick & Missoni, unpublished data).
Chronostratigraphic age: Kimmeridgian to Tithonian (?Lower Berriasian).
Biostratigraphy: biostratigraphic data only available from the
assemblages of benthic foraminifera and dasycladalean algae (Darga & Schlagintweit, 1991; Dya, 1992; Schlagintweit & Ebli, 2000; Schlagintweit, 2005).
No data available from underlying
or overlying units.
Thickness: several 100 metres.
Lithostratigraphically higher rank: Plassen Group.
Subdivision: the former subdivision in the basal Lofer-Facies (or
Lofer Member) and an upper unit, the Lärchkogel Limestone cannot be obtained
any longer. Both, the basal part with its transition to the Sillenkopf
Formation and the uppermost part with pronounced terrigeneous influx are
similar in their lithology (but with different microfossil associations; Schlagintweit, Gawlick & Missoni,
unpublished data), probably resulting from the misinterpretation as a
transgressive succession.
Underlying units (footwall boundary): Sillenkopf Formation in a proximal facies
in the type area.
Overlying units (hangingwall boundary): eroded.
This paragraph has been concealed! Download the complete document for free! • Click on download to get complete and readable text • This is a free of charge document sharing network • First upload your own document, and you get a word document per email • No registration necessary, gratis Swap homeworks and notes at no charge! Gratis scripts for students and pupils! Remnants in the Salzkammergut (see
chapter Agatha Limestone).
Lateral units: Sillenkopf Formation (see chapter Sillenkopf
Formation and chapter Agatha Limestone).
Remarks: the type section,
Mount Loferer Kalvarienberg (Ferneck,
1962) exposes only the topmost parts and the final coarsening-upward sequence
(= Lofer Beds sensu Hahn, 1910) of the formation. Differences to the Plassen Formation is
either lithologically (“Plassen Limestone” pure carbonate without siliciclastic
input, and Triassic extraclasts), and
micropaleontologically with typical dasycladalean algae only known from the
Lärchberg Formation (e.g., Schlagintweit
& Ebli, 2000; Schlagintweit, 2005), other dasycladalean algae only known from the
Plassen Formation (Schlagintweit
et al., 2005). Additional the sedimentary evolution of the succession is completely
different, especially the final evolution during the Berriasian (drowning of
the Plassen Formation sensu stricto in the north, emersion of the Lärchberg
Formation in the south) (e.g., Gawlick
& Schlagintweit, 2006; Missoni & Gawlick, in press).
Oberalm
Formation (Oberalm-Formation)
+
Barmstein Limestone (Barmsteinkalke)
Validity: valid; first description by Lipold (1854: 595
p.).
This paragraph has been concealed! Download the complete document for free! • Click on download to get complete and readable text • This is a free of charge document sharing network • First upload your own document, and you get a word document per email • No registration necessary, gratis Swap homeworks and notes at no charge! Gratis scripts for students and pupils! History until 1976 in Tollmann (1976a). Revisited by Gawlick et al. (2005).
Type area: ÖK 94 Hallein; Salzburg Calcareous Alps and
Salzkammergut area.
Type section: ÖK 94 Hallein; quarry “Adneter Riedel” near the town Oberalm,
12 km SSE of Salzburg for the Oberalm Formation; for Barmstein Limestone:
Kleiner and Grosser Barmstein, 1 km NW of the city Hallein.
Reference section(s): not designated.
Derivation of name: ÖK 94 Hallein; town Oberalm near Hallein.
Synonyms: Wurzen Limestone (“Wurzener Kalk”) of Plöchinger & Prey (1968); Tressenstein Limestone.
Lithology: well-bedded grey limestones (bed-thickness mostly between
5-10 cm; but up to 70 cm); often with dark chert layers and nodules (see Schlager, 1953; Tollmann, 1976a).
Fossils: Barmstein Limestones: dominating stromatoporoids (Fenninger, 1972; Steiger, 1981), rare corals, benthic
foraminifera and calcareous algae (Steiger, 1981; Gawlick
et al., 2005; Schlagintweit et al., 2004; Schlagintweit & Gawlick, 2006). Hemipelagic limestones of the Oberalm
Formation: calpionellids, radiolarians (for details see Steiger, 1992).
Origin, facies: basinal, hemipelagic limestones with mass-flows of
shallow-water origin (Barmstein Limestone – Gawlick
et al., 2005; revision of the type-locality.
Chronostratigraphic age: Late Tithonian (Crassicollaria calpionellid-zone)
to Early Berriasian (Calpionella calpionellid-zone).
Biostratigraphy: Crassicollaria calpionellid-zone to Calpionella
calpionellid-zone.
Thickness: up to 700 metres in the type region.
Lithostratigraphically
higher rank: Plassen
Group.
Subdivision: no subdivision.
This paragraph has been concealed! Download the complete document for free! • Click on download to get complete and readable text • This is a free of charge document sharing network • First upload your own document, and you get a word document per email • No registration necessary, gratis Swap homeworks and notes at no charge! Gratis scripts for students and pupils!
Overlying units (hangingwall boundary): Schrambach Formation.
Geographic distribution: in the central Northern Calcareous Alps; south and
southeast of Salzburg (see Fenninger, 1967: Fig. 1; Tollmann, 1976a), probably also in the eastern Northern
Calcareous Alps (see chapter Obersee Breccia).
Lateral units: Plassen Formation.
Remarks: the Oberalm Formation with the intercalated Barmstein Limestones is
restricted to the geographic distribution of the Tauglboden Basin and its southern rim, the collapsing Trattberg Rise (Gawlick
& Schlagintweit, 2009). Due to strong tectonics around the
Early/Late Tithonian boundary also the northern part of the Trattberg Rise
becomes at that time part of this basin. Other similar well-bedded, but much
older (Kimmeridgian to Early Tithonian) cherty limestones in the Salzkammergut
region (e.g., Mount Loser – Rasser
et al., 2003; Mount Sandling – Gawlick
et al., 2007a), or in the western Northern Calcareous Alps (e.g., Rofan
Mountains – Wächter, 1987) must
be revised and belong to another formations (e.g., Ammergau Formation in the
western Northern Calcareous Alps).
This paragraph has been concealed! Download the complete document for free! • Click on download to get complete and readable text • This is a free of charge document sharing network • First upload your own document, and you get a word document per email • No registration necessary, gratis Swap homeworks and notes at no charge! Gratis scripts for students and pupils!
Ammergau Formation
(Ammergau-Formation)
+ Seekarspitz
Limestone
Validity: valid; first description by Schafhäutl (1846: “Ammergauer
Wetzstein-Schichten”); for the history until 1976 and definition see Tollmann (1976a); needs some revision and formalization.
Seekarspitz Limestone introduced by Trauth
(1950). Some modern investigations were caried out by Schütz (1979), Koch
& Stengel-Rutkowski (1959), and Mohtat-Aghai
(1999).
Type area: ÖK 50 map sheet 86 Ammerwald; area around the town Ammergau
(Bavaria) for the distal part of the Ammergau Formation.
Type section: the type section is located at the Ammergau area
(Austrian-German borderland). For the Seekarspitz Limestone Mount Seekarlspitze
in the Rofan Mountains (ÖK 119
Schwaz).
Reference section(s): reference sections of the distal part of the Ammergauer
Formation are in the area around the Tegernsee (Germany). A desribed succession
exists from the Tiefenbach estuary, east of the lake Tegernsee (Schafhäutl, 1846). For Seekarspitz
Limestone see Wähner & Spengler
(1935), Trauth (1950), and Wächter (1987).
Derivation of name: after the Ammergau region in southern Germany (Bavaria).
|