Title, Topic

Jurassic Austroalpine .doc

®
Page 1 of 42
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42]
Faculty
Natural Science
Discipline
Geology
Document category
Summary
University, School
Montanuniversität Leoben
Additional information
2009 Prof
Responsible User
This text has been add by user ans-775 on 2009-08-24. Disclaimer
Popularity
1.271  visits
Document length
~42.059  Words
~268.857  Chars
Rating
Networking




















More documents
Geology

Katastrophen, die die Welt veränderten
Katastrophen die die Welt veränderten 2005 erschütterte Hurrikan Katrina die amerikanische Bevölkerung von New Orleans. Bis zu 80% des Stadtgebietes stand bis zu 7,60 Meter unter Wasser. Der Klim


Raumanalyse
Raumanalyse Klausuren Ersatz Fragestellung : Welche Faktoren beeinflussen Darmstadts Ruf als Wissenschaftsstadt­? Die Planung Das Ziel unserer Idee hinter der Frage war, eine möglichst präzis


Wienerneustadt
Wiener Neustadt · Geografie · Geschichte · Religion · Städtepartnerschaf­ten · Sehenswürdigkeiten­ Geografie Wiener Neustadt befindet sich im -Steinfeld-, dies ist der südlichs


Geographie Allgemein
Geografie Blatt / Nr. 1 – 9,2 1.) Nennen sie die natürlichen Faktoren, die sie bei einer Beschreibung des Naturraums heranziehen müssen. - Klima - Relief - Vegetation - Bodennutzung 2.) Ordne

Jurassic Austroalpine

Edited by Gawlick, H.-J. & Missoni, S.

Gawlick, H.-J., Missoni, S., Schlagintweit, F., Suzuki, H., Krystyn, L. & Lein, R.

Address of the authors:

Hans-Jürgen Gawlick and Sigrid Missoni, University of Leoben, Department for Applied Geosciences and Geophysics, Prospection and Applied Sedimentology, Peter-Tunner-Strasse 5, 8700 Leoben, Austria; e-mail: hans-juergen.gawlick@mu-leoben.at; s.missoni@daad-alumni.de

Felix Schlagintweit, Lerchenauer Strasse 167, 80935 München, Germany; e-mail: ef.schlagintweit@t-online.de

Hisashi Suzuki, Otani University, Koyama-Kamifusa-cho, Kita-ku, Kyoto 603-8143, Japan; hsuzuki@res.otani.ac.jp

Leopold Krystyn, University of Vienna, Centre for Earth Sciences, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria; e-mail: leopold.krystyn@univie.ac.at

Richard Lein, University of Vienna, Centre for Earth Sciences, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria; e-mail: richard.lein@univie.ac.at

Introduction

In the year 2004, the Stratigraphic Table of Austria was printed in summarizing the formations and lithostratigraphic names for the different tectonic units in Austria. Since this time a lot of investigations brought several new data on these formations, especially in the Northern Calcareous Alps.

This paragraph has been concealed!
Download the complete document for free!
Jurassic Austroalpine.doc
• Click on download to get complete and readable text
• This is a free of charge document sharing network
• First upload your own document, and you get a word document per email
• No registration necessary, gratis
Swap homeworks and notes at no charge!
Gratis scripts for students and pupils!

Fig. 1 is an updated version of the used formations and lithostratigraphic names from the Stratigraphic Table of Austria 2004. The description of the Jurassic formations enclose partly the lowermost Cretaceous (Berriasian and Valanginian), due to several formations crossing the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary.

A new stratigraphic cycle in the preserved sedimentary evolution started in the Late Berriasian.

These formations occur in several tectonic units of today different geographic regions, and further of different palaeogeographic derivation (e.g., Northern Calcareous Alps, Drau-Range, Central Alpine Mesozoika), formed mostly before and partly during younger tectonic movements. Therefore, we describe these formations independently from the tectonic subdivision and summarize the overall Jurassic tectonosedimentary evolution as introduction for the genetic understanding of formations and lithostratigraphic names.

In general the Jurassic history of the Austroalpine mirrors the palaeogeographic position in between two oceanic domains: A) to the west (northwest) the newly formed Penninic Ocean, where continental extension starts around the Triassic/Jurassic boundary and first oceanic crust was formed in late Early Jurassic and B) to the east (southeast) the Neotethys Ocean, in which closure starts before the Early/Middle Jurassic boundary.

This paragraph has been concealed!
Download the complete document for free!
Jurassic Austroalpine.doc
• Click on download to get complete and readable text
• This is a free of charge document sharing network
• First upload your own document, and you get a word document per email
• No registration necessary, gratis
Swap homeworks and notes at no charge!
Gratis scripts for students and pupils!

Only in the westernmost part of the Austroalpine extensional tectonics led to the formation of the newly formed eastern passive continental margin of the Penninic Ocean. In Middle Jurassic times the situation generally changed due to the partial closure of the Neotethys Ocean. The Austroalpine became in that time a lower plate position.

Westdirected nappe thrusting and the formation of deep-water trenches in front of the prograding nappes crosscut the former facies belts. Tectonic shortening decreased in Late Jurassic times. New shallow-water carbonate ramps and platforms established, they seal the main tectonic shortening and prevail untill the Early Cretaceous.

Northern Calcareous Alps

At the Triassic/Jurassic boundary the carbonate production rate was significantly reduced in connection with the environmental crisis leading to mass extinction. A lack of sufficient sediment supply led to the drowning of the Hauptdolomite/Dachstein Carbonate Platform.

Later on a horst and graben morphology developed (Bernoulli & Jenkyns, 1974; Eberli, 1988; Krainer et al., 1994) and triggered breccia formation along submarine slopes and escarpments, in the Northern Calcareous Alps mainly in Pliensbachian to Early Toarcian times (Böhm et al., 1995) (Fig. 1).

This paragraph has been concealed!
Download the complete document for free!
Jurassic Austroalpine.doc
• Click on download to get complete and readable text
• This is a free of charge document sharing network
• First upload your own document, and you get a word document per email
• No registration necessary, gratis
Swap homeworks and notes at no charge!
Gratis scripts for students and pupils!

Breccia formation in late Early Jurassic times was mostly interpreted due to the opening of the Penninic Ocean (e.g., Bernoulli & Jenkyns, 1974; Eberli, 1988; Krainer et al., 1994).

Whereas the early Early Jurassic sequences of the Lower Austroalpine show the typical features of a rifted margin (e.g., Eberli, 1988), the Bavaric and Tirolic units were only slightly influenced by these rifting processes.

In contrast, late Early Jurassic tectonic movements affected mainly the Tirolic unit and resulted in a completely new palaeogeographic setting, whereas the Bavaric to Lower Austroalpine units show only mild or no influence of these tectonic processes (Fig. 1). This change in the late Early Jurassic was interpreted by many authors also as a result of the opening of the Penninic Ocean (e.g., Eberli, 1988, 1991; Krainer et al., 1994).

In contrast, Frisch & Gawlick (2003) and Missoni & Gawlick (in press) attributed this “event” to the onset of subduction in the Neotethys Ocean.

Due to the subduction processes in the Neotethys realm and contemporaneous out-of-sequence thrusting in the more continentward parts (Juvavic and Tirolic nappes), the sedimentation pattern in the Northern Calcareous Alps changed dramatically in the Middle Jurassic (Gawlick & Frisch, 2003), and not in the Oxfordian as formerly assumed (Tollmann, 1985).

This paragraph has been concealed!
Download the complete document for free!
Jurassic Austroalpine.doc
• Click on download to get complete and readable text
• This is a free of charge document sharing network
• First upload your own document, and you get a word document per email
• No registration necessary, gratis
Swap homeworks and notes at no charge!
Gratis scripts for students and pupils!

The main difference of Hallstatt and Tauglboden Mélanges was the earlier onset and the different composition of huge mass-flows in the Hallstatt Mélange basins. The mélanges are interpreted as carbonate-clastic-radiolaritic trench fills formed in sequence due to the closure of parts of the Neotethys Ocean.

The Plassen Carbonate Platform (Late Oxfordian to Early Berriasian) developed above the trenches in a shallowing-upward cycle during tectonically active periods in a convergent regime (Gawlick & Schlagintweit, 2006).

In the Late Kimmeridgian to Early Berriasian huge masses of shallow-water carbonates were formed. The platform carbonates are covered by calpionellid-radiolaria wackestones to packstones, of Late Berriasian age. A siliciclastic influenced drowning sequence (Schrambach Formation) sealed the highly differentiated Plassen Carbonate Platform.

The onset, evolution and drowning of the Plassen Carbonate Platform took place in a tectonic active regime. The tectonic evolution of the Northern Calcareous Alps during Kimmeridgian to Berriasian times and the final drowning of the Plassen Carbonate Platform can be interpreted as a result of further tectonic shortening and uplift of the accretionary prism after the closure of parts of the Neotethys Ocean.

This led to erosion of siliciclastic material, which reached at this time the inner parts of the Northern Calcareous Alps.

 

 

Bavaric nappe group

 


Page 1 of 42
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42]


swopdoc.com ist not responsible for the content of this text provided by third parties

Legal info - Copyright - Terms - Partner - Statistik - Contact
antiblock.org adblockdetector.com

Swap your documents